QUOTE (ADMYAMAMOTO @ Oct 6 2009, 11:07 AM)

That was not needed. Before we invaded Iraq there was little violence and taliban were not strong there. Only after the invasion did violence escalate as the taliban had the opportunity to begin a rising there against the UN and Iraq. The current civil war there also wouldnt be as intense as it is now.
Did you forget that Saddam was constantly massacring his own people?
Right, minor detail there.
Afghanistan->taliban->9/11... enough said there.
Iraq. The worldwide opinion was that there were WMDs in the hands of evil dictator Saddam Hussein that were going to be used against America and its allies, endangering public safety and well being. That was the view. No matter how bleeder you are you did not know that they did not have these weapons. What's scary is people that voted against going into Iraq ,because there was no possible way of knowing that there were no WMDs when it was the worldwide opinion. I'm not sure about you, but I believe in taking out murderer dictators who slaughter their own people, if it will ensure the safetly of my people and my family and my friends... especially when everyone believes that he indeed is goind to harm them.
So he didn't have the WMDs. Well we went in there and took him out, so now its damned well our job to make sure the government is fixed and does not plummet into a state of chaos and anarchy, leaving terrorist leaders a straight path into power.
People against the war in Iraq. It seems either you don't care if your own people are blown to bits, or you believe in hit and run, going into a country and destroying their leader, leaving them to fend for themselves. That's against/pull out for you.